PERSPECTIVE | An Open Letter to Councilmember Suzie Price: We Demand Community Safety Not Safety Theater
5 minute readThe views expressed in this perspective piece do not necessarily reflect the views of FORTHE.
Dear Councilmember Suzie Price,
You may remember us. We are your constituents from District 3, who, with the Anti-Surveillance Coalition, attended the City Council meeting on Oct. 4 to comment on a major public safety issue affecting our city. We sat there for nearly five hours, patiently waiting for the agenda item that drew us to speak. Finally, we presented our comments, explaining our fears about dangers that are already harming Long Beach residents and tearing at the fabric of our city. We were there to resist the militarization of the Long Beach Police Department (LBPD), which continues to arm its officers with military weapons and surveillance equipment.
Last year, the California legislature passed AB 481 in order to reduce the militarization of police departments around the state. As a prosecutor, you should understand the burdens of proof. Under AB 481, prior to allowing LBPD to purchase new military equipment or continue to use its weapons of war—which, as they presented, includes large caliber rifles, thermal spy cameras, flash-bang grenades, and armored personnel carriers—LBPD was required to prove that the equipment was the only option and that their arsenal would protect our civil liberties.
Given that LBPD admitted to spying on protestors during the 2020 uprisings with the very military-grade thermal camera you approved, we don’t see how they could possibly have met this burden. You were also required to place legally enforceable strictures on LBPD’s use of any military equipment and impose transparency and accountability measures.
This is a serious duty because, as the state legislature recognized in passing AB 481, “the acquisition of military equipment and its deployment in our communities adversely impacts the public’s safety and welfare, including increased risk of civilian deaths, significant risks to civil rights, civil liberties, and physical and psychological well-being, and incurment of significant financial costs,” and, because the equipment “is more frequently deployed in low-income Black and Brown communities…the risks and impacts of police militarization are experienced most acutely in marginalized communities.” LBPD is no exception, but rather one of the most violent police departments in the country.
You cannot arm for safety, especially if you are arming LBPD.
At least five residents from District 3—your constituents—spoke out against approving LBPD’s cache of military weaponry and its proposed Special Order, which is so weak that it functionally releases LBPD from the oversight and accountability that the police department and the City Council owe residents under AB 481. The council disappointed us when it voted unanimously to approve LBPD’s continued use of military equipment, against our objections and with little more than conjecture into the equipment’s necessity, thus abdicating its responsibility under AB 481.
However, the council’s tepid deliberation still exceeded your complete lack of response to our public safety concerns. You disrespected your constituents by declining to acknowledge our concerns and those of the other commenters on this issue, who unanimously spoke against LBPD’s use of military equipment.
We could not help but notice how much warmer your response was to property owners and business interests Downtown than to some of your own constituents. You introduced the agenda item about the Metro stopping Downtown and actively participated in a lengthy discussion on that topic. You continued to spend ample council time on this item, even after Councilmember Cindy Allen (District 2), who formerly represented Downtown, explained that the data she collected showed that your agenda item was a non-issue.
Tomisin Oluwole
Dine with Me, 2022
Acrylic on canvas
36 x 24 inches
Click here to check out our interview with Tomisin Oluwole, a literary and visual artist based in Long Beach.
Moreover, Councilmember Mary Zendejas (District 1)—who actually represents Downtown and the area surrounding the Metro stop—voiced opposition to your proposal. Your respectful, rapt attention to the District 1 residents and businesses lingered over an hour for that agenda item. You even gave them a thumbs-up after the discussion on that topic had closed.
However, when it came time for the council to discuss the impact of authorizing military equipment for LBPD, you rushed the process. You seconded the motion to approve the item quietly, despite the microphone you used with such gusto earlier in the evening. We, your constituents, did not hear a word from you about the substance of our comments.
This is about the safety of Long Beach residents. If you care about our safety as much as you appear to when talking about the Metro policy Downtown, you would listen when we say weapons of war do not belong in our city.
We address this letter to you as your constituents, whom you and the rest of the council ignored. A council that includes you and Vice Mayor Rex Richardson, who are both vying to become Long Beach’s next mayor in next month’s election. The entire City Council failed when it approved the LBPD’s use of military equipment on Oct. 4 and when it voted to approve the rules LBPD wrote for itself on Oct. 18.
No matter who wins the upcoming election, we need leadership that will stand up to LBPD. Long Beach needs real community safety, not safety theater.
Caitlin Bellis, Helen Boyer, and Caspian Nash
District 3 Residents
Caitlin Bellis is an attorney who works on immigration policy for a national nonprofit. Caitlin clerked for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and is a graduate of Yale Law School and Reed College. She lives in Long Beach with her partner and their dog.
Helen Boyer is a Long Beach resident and an immigration attorney at a local nonprofit.
Caspian Nash is a Master of Social Work student at CSULB and the co-founder of a Long Beach-based nonprofit.