PERSPECTIVE | We Can’t Afford the Price of Suzie as Mayor

4 minute read

The views expressed in this perspective piece do not necessarily reflect the views of FORTHE.

Léelo en español.

As undocumented people and community organizers with deep roots in Long Beach, we know what is on the line for workers, tenants, and immigrants of color in the mayoral race between Vice Mayor Rex Richardson and Councilmember Suzie Price.

Having lived in Long Beach collectively for over two decades, we have experienced the implications of having racist and xenophobic local politicians. Our city has become a hotbed for evictions where your life expectancy is determined by your zip code and where families are separated by deportation

For many years, we have all organized against these issues and have advocated, along with others in the community, for policies like the Long Beach Values Act, panic buttons for hotel workers, tenant protections, the Long Beach Justice Fund, and improved language access. Price did not support most of these policies, including the Long Beach Justice Fund, which is now working to support immigrant families in danger of deportation, a program Price voted against

We cannot allow her to become the next mayor of our city. 

Price has voted and spoken against the asks of our communities and has refused to sit down to listen to the needs of communities of color. She very intentionally uses her immigrant background for political gain, but has done nothing in support of immigrant families in this city. It is clear to us that our communities can not afford to have a mayor like Price, whose voting record shows us that she does not care about or listen to Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) in Long Beach.  

Based on our experiences organizing in our city, we believe that Richardson is someone we can hold accountable to make Long Beach the city BIPOC communities deserve. He was the only councilmember who answered the door when we, along with the community, demonstrated outside the homes of elected officials as we were fighting for tenant protections.  

Tomisin Oluwole
Fragmented Reflection I, 2021
Acrylic on canvas panel
24 x 30 inches

Click here to check out our interview with Tomisin Oluwole, a literary and visual artist based in Long Beach.

Instead of gunking up our site with ads, we use this space to display and promote the work of local artists.

Although Richardson is not an immigrant, he has sat down with immigrant residents and listened to the concerns of the undocumented people who live in our city. Long Beach needs a mayor who will stand up for all its residents regardless of race, gender, sexuality, income, and immigration status. We need a mayor who understands that we all do our part in making Long Beach what it is today. In regards to representation and moving towards equity, if elected, Richardson would be the first Black mayor from the Ninth District, an area of the city that is often underrepresented and underserved. 

In Long Beach, where we have a part-time City Council, the mayor and their appointees hold the power and influence to create or block policies and city resources that directly affect the well-being and recovery of Black, Indegenous, Cambodian, Latine, Filipino, queer, and undocumented communities. That’s why we take this race extremely seriously and why we are supporting Richardson for Long Beach mayor.

As organizers, we also understand that voting is only one tool at our disposal to influence change. Organizing our communities towards justice remains our ultimate goal. Part of that organizing is getting people to understand what’s at stake in local city elections and the power they hold to elect the mayor of our city. 

We know the electoral system is flawed—so much so that the state has denied the four of us, along with more than 11 million other undocumented people, the right to vote. Yet this election has major implications for the lives of Long Beach’s undocumented population. 

We still believe it is important to elect people that we can hold accountable and build with. After the election, there will be a lot of work ahead to put words into action. We will continue to organize and build a city that is welcoming and equitable to all its residents. 

We may not be able to vote, but our voices are loud and clear during this election: We can’t afford the price of Suzie as mayor! 

Vote on Nov. 8 in support of Richardson!

Gaby Hernandez, Maria Lopez, Maribel Cruz, and Norberto Lopez are undocumented organizers and residents in Long Beach.

Contact The Author

[1] Militarily demobilized. Since WWII—which was both the death knell of European colonial empires as well as the starting shot of the American neocolonial era—Europe has had notoriously scant standing armies, and has been able to consistently slash government military spending domestically and as a percentage of their contributions to international diplomatic bodies such as the UN. This is because nowadays European nations very rarely find themselves in situations where they need to independently send their militaries abroad in order to secure trade routes, foreign resources, or privileges within markets overseas; the U.S. has been fulfilling that hard-power obligation for them for over half a century. The social results of Western Europe’s decreased militarization are striking, especially when contrasted with the U.S.: there is not a single country in Western Europe without universal healthcare, labor rights and welfare systems are strong, value is placed on corporate and financial regulation, environmental policy is lightyears ahead, and, not least of all, there is a robust governmental approach to curbing digital surveillance and reining in tech monopolies. Japan enjoys a similar arrangement with the U.S. in which it, too, is militarily demobilized yet is given full access to, and prominence in, the global economy. In the last decade there has been a reversing trend of remilitarization in some of these nations. That trend was hastened during the last four years as a result of Trump’s ultranationalist politics, but is likely to continue even after his departure in large part due to the growing bipolar geopolitical climate of competition between superpowers.

The “owner” bit of home-“owner” appears in scare quotes throughout the text for reasons that will shortly become apparent.

Nothing signals trouble quite like consensus.

More on them later.

And, anyways, what exactly remains “obvious” in an era “post-truth”?

I take as my starting position that even the “obvious” must be won.

It’s like Lenin said, you know…

Whether directly, or through a chain of investments, or through the wider speculative market in real estate.

I use “banks” in this piece as a stand-in for several sources of income that derive partly through the mortgaging of property and/or investment in institutions that have the power to mortgage property.

That is just its “ideology.”

The Ricardian “law of rent” explains that any location with an advantage over another location, can accrue an economic value, called “rent,” to the owner.

This happens without the owner needing to pitch in to create the advantage.

If the owner does pitch in, then the value accrued from that advantage cannot be called “rent.”

“Rent,” in economic terms, is only, precisely, the value accrued from that portion of the advantage for which the owner is not responsible. That is what we mean when we say, “Rent is theft.”

This does not mean places with lower property taxes ipso facto have higher property prices—and that is because the property tax is only one of the contributing factors. You could have zero taxes on land in Antarctica, for instance, and it would still sell for $0. This is why the introduction to the analogy controls for such variables.

This is the logical conclusion of believing two premises:

(1) All humans have an equal right to the Earth.
(2) Vaginal birth is a lottery system

Prop 13 is rent control for home-“owners.” You can learn more about its history and impact here.

“Hamlet” by William Shakespeare. Act 4, Scene 5

This is why the lobbyists who spend the most money to support the mortgage interest deduction are bankers, mortgagers, and realtors.

Term

Definition