<meta property="og:title" content="Long Beach to Fight Deportations With Immigrant Legal Services Fund, Community Defense Network"> <meta name="twitter:title" content="Long Beach to Fight Deportations With Immigrant Legal Services Fund, Community Defense Network"> Long Beach to Fight Deportations With Immigrant Legal Services Fund, Community Defense Network

Long Beach to Fight Deportations With Immigrant Legal Services Fund, Community Defense Network

The city announced the selection of its legal service provider.

8 minute read

Immigrants will have access to the long-awaited Long Beach Justice Fund starting next month, a robust coalition of immigrant rights activists, the Vera Institute of Justice, attorneys, and the city of Long Beach announced at a press conference Wednesday.

“With 2.2 million non-citizen residents in the Los Angeles-Long Beach metro area that are vulnerable to deportation proceedings and four out of seven children having an immigrant parent, the need for representation in Long Beach is especially stark,” said Tania Sawczuk, a senior program associate with Vera.

The coalition announced they’ve selected Immigrant Defenders Law Center (ImmDef) as the legal service provider for the fund after a competitive proposal process. ImmDef is a Los Angeles-based social justice law firm and a leader in the growing national movement for a public defender system for immigrants facing deportation.

“The thing that’s really exciting is that we’re making a commitment and the city of Long Beach is making a commitment to due process for all,” ImmDef Executive Director Lindsay Toczylowski said. “That is really giving people the tools they need to fight back, because without a lawyer sitting up in a remote ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) detention center, it’s nearly impossible to fight your case.”

She said ImmDef is excited that they won’t have to turn anyone away based on the merits of their case or whether they have a criminal record.

They also debuted the Community Defense Network, a rapid response network that mobilizes trained community members to the scene of an ICE pick-up or potential deportation in Long Beach. Once there, responders will act as observers, filming ICE agents and documenting the circumstances of the interaction. The network will also connect individuals to legal services and contact family members.

Long Beach will be joining Vera’s SAFE Cities Network (Safety and Fairness For Everyone), a group of 12 cities and counties that have committed to providing legal representation to undocumented individuals. Other California jurisdictions in the network include Sacramento, Oakland/Alameda County, and Santa Ana.

“The people of Long Beach understand that the stakes are high in immigration court and that fairness dictates that no one should have to face exile from their community, their family, their children simply because they cannot afford an attorney,” said Sawczuk, who works on the SAFE team. “One of the tenets of our nation is due process of law, and without access to legal representation, you can have no due process.”

“The Long Beach Justice Fund goes a long way to rectifying that problem,” she said.

The one-time $250,000 grant set aside by the city for the Long Beach Justice Fund is part of the People’s Budget that was lobbied for by a coalition of community groups during the city budget hearings last year. Vera added to the city’s “seed” funds with another $100,000.  

The legal services fund is expected to be maintained with charitable contributions from individuals and organizations with additional grants possible from California’s Immigration Services program, according to Deputy City Manager Kevin Jackson.

In order to be eligible for the legal aid, a person must live or work in Long Beach or else have significant ties to Long Beach residents. They must also have a household income below 200 percent of the federal poverty line—about $51,000 for a family of four.

Although immigrants facing removal from the U.S. do have a right to defend themselves in court proceedings, the government is not obligated to provide them with free council. Even immigrant children are not entitled to a government-funded attorney, a federal judge ruled last year. And the consequences of deportation have in some cases proven to be deadly.

With access to an attorney, immigrants are more likely to defend themselves, to win their cases, to be released from custody, and once released, to show up to future court hearings, a 2015 study found.

Meanwhile, asylum decisions vary – sometimes drastically – from one judge to the next, including among judges who hear cases in the same court. This holds true even when cases are identical in nearly every other way. Having representation helps buffer the wildly varying biases of the judges.

Though many people placed in immigration proceedings have a valid claim to remain in the U.S., they have trouble understanding or arguing their cases alone. Even other attorneys who do not typically represent immigrants have a tough time understanding immigration law.

Tomisin Oluwole
Coquette
Acrylic on canvas
18 x 24 inches

Click here to check out our interview with Tomisin Oluwole, a a literary and visual artist based in Long Beach.

Instead of gunking up our site with ads, we use this space to display and promote the work of local artists.

Councilmembers Suzie Price (CD-3) and Stacy Mungo (CD-5) were the most vocal opponents to allowing Vera to manage the fund, ultimately voting against it along with Councilmember Daryl Supernaw (CD-4) in December. Price wanted “limitations” in place for those convicted of more serious crimes.

But the justice fund will provide universal representation.

Vera, an independent nonprofit national research and policy organization, is set to manage the fund for two years under a contract with Long Beach, providing oversight, support, and data-driven analyses of the program’s progress. After that, Vera will partner with local stakeholders and the city to find a community-based organization to take over when the contract is up.

At the press conference, Councilmember Lena Gonzalez (CD-1), who spearheaded the fund’s implementation, thanked the various immigrant rights activist groups standing behind her who worked to get both projects off the ground.

“I want to make sure that we continue pushing forward,” Gonzalez said. “As we know, our city has faced major issues in various communities, we know we have to keep pushing to ensure our immigrant families stay together.”

Although ImmDef is the acting service provider, Ana Arce with Latinos in Action California welcomed other lawyers in the area to volunteer their pro bono time to join the effort.

The Community Defense Network is also looking for volunteers, especially those who are bilingual and speak Spanish or Khmer, a language spoken in the Cambodian community.

That community has become vulnerable to deportations after ICE performed a series of raids last year. Deportations of Southeast Asian Americans have increased markedly since the start of the Trump administration, according to the Asian Law Caucus, a legal aid and civil rights organization serving low-income Asian Pacific American communities. Deportations of Cambodian-Americans increased by 279 percent between 2017 and 2018, and Vietnamese Americans saw a 68 percent increase over the same period.

When the Trump administration began threatening countries that up until recently refused to repatriate citizens with sanctions, a loss of financial support or by cutting off the visas of high-level foreign officials, Cambodia capitulated. As a result, most of those being targeted have lived in the United States for decades and were given work permits. Many have American citizen children and family members or other deep attachments to the community.

In fact, the overall proportion of cases involving immigrants who have been living in the U.S. for years has gone up significantly under the Trump administration as ICE has been redirected to focus on capturing as many undocumented immigrants as possible rather than on those who’d recently arrived or been charged with a violent offense. Prior to 2018, only six percent of new cases involved immigrants who’d lived in the U.S. for two years or more, according to the TRAC Immigration Project. That number has since risen to 43 percent.

Toczylowski warned that because the two closest immigrant detention facilities in Orange County would be closing soon, Long Beach residents detained by ICE will now often be sent to a facility just over 100 miles away.

“In Adelanto, California, in the high desert, where there is a huge for-profit prison that does ICE’s dirty work for it in holding our community there, where people are very unlikely to have representation, Long Beach will be giving them hope,” Toczylowski said. “The ripple effects of the hope that they are giving to immigrant communities will be felt across this city.”

The legal defense fund is part of a larger strategy to protect the immigrant community in the city laid out in the Long Beach Values Act of 2018, which the council passed in March.

The Community Defense Network, which is part of the Sanctuary Long Beach campaign, can be reached on their emergency line at (562) 269-1083 in the case of an ICE raid or pick-up or to notify them of impending ICE action.

FORTHE member Joe Brizzolara also contributed to this report.

Ariana Sawyer is a freelance immigration reporter based in Los Angeles, an intern with the Human Rights Watch, US-Program’s immigration team, and a graduate student of international policy and development at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies where she focuses on migration, trafficking, and human security.

Contact The Author

[1] Militarily demobilized. Since WWII—which was both the death knell of European colonial empires as well as the starting shot of the American neocolonial era—Europe has had notoriously scant standing armies, and has been able to consistently slash government military spending domestically and as a percentage of their contributions to international diplomatic bodies such as the UN. This is because nowadays European nations very rarely find themselves in situations where they need to independently send their militaries abroad in order to secure trade routes, foreign resources, or privileges within markets overseas; the U.S. has been fulfilling that hard-power obligation for them for over half a century. The social results of Western Europe’s decreased militarization are striking, especially when contrasted with the U.S.: there is not a single country in Western Europe without universal healthcare, labor rights and welfare systems are strong, value is placed on corporate and financial regulation, environmental policy is lightyears ahead, and, not least of all, there is a robust governmental approach to curbing digital surveillance and reining in tech monopolies. Japan enjoys a similar arrangement with the U.S. in which it, too, is militarily demobilized yet is given full access to, and prominence in, the global economy. In the last decade there has been a reversing trend of remilitarization in some of these nations. That trend was hastened during the last four years as a result of Trump’s ultranationalist politics, but is likely to continue even after his departure in large part due to the growing bipolar geopolitical climate of competition between superpowers.

The “owner” bit of home-“owner” appears in scare quotes throughout the text for reasons that will shortly become apparent.

Nothing signals trouble quite like consensus.

More on them later.

And, anyways, what exactly remains “obvious” in an era “post-truth”?

I take as my starting position that even the “obvious” must be won.

It’s like Lenin said, you know…

Whether directly, or through a chain of investments, or through the wider speculative market in real estate.

I use “banks” in this piece as a stand-in for several sources of income that derive partly through the mortgaging of property and/or investment in institutions that have the power to mortgage property.

That is just its “ideology.”

The Ricardian “law of rent” explains that any location with an advantage over another location, can accrue an economic value, called “rent,” to the owner.

This happens without the owner needing to pitch in to create the advantage.

If the owner does pitch in, then the value accrued from that advantage cannot be called “rent.”

“Rent,” in economic terms, is only, precisely, the value accrued from that portion of the advantage for which the owner is not responsible. That is what we mean when we say, “Rent is theft.”

This does not mean places with lower property taxes ipso facto have higher property prices—and that is because the property tax is only one of the contributing factors. You could have zero taxes on land in Antarctica, for instance, and it would still sell for $0. This is why the introduction to the analogy controls for such variables.

This is the logical conclusion of believing two premises:

(1) All humans have an equal right to the Earth.
(2) Vaginal birth is a lottery system

Prop 13 is rent control for home-“owners.” You can learn more about its history and impact here.

“Hamlet” by William Shakespeare. Act 4, Scene 5

This is why the lobbyists who spend the most money to support the mortgage interest deduction are bankers, mortgagers, and realtors.

Term

Definition