Student Groups File FPPC Complaint against LBUSD Board Candidate, CSULB, and Professor
by Kevin Flores | Published June 2, 2018 in Journalism
8 minute readTwo student groups have filed a complaint with the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) alleging that a professor at Cal State Long Beach assigned students to phone bank for another faculty member, Juan Benitez, who is running for a seat on the Long Beach Unified School District Board of Education.
The allegations stem from an assignment made by Rigoberto Rodriguez for a class he taught last semester called “Latina/o Populations in the U.S.” The assignment directed students to “join the school board campaign efforts of the Teachers Association of Long Beach.”
TALB—a union representing teachers and other school staff in the LBUSD—voted to endorse Benitez in October and since then has been campaigning exclusively for him in the race.
The assignment was due just over two weeks before the primary election for the board’s District 3 seat took place, which had two other candidates on the ballot, Eduardo Lara and Cesar Armendariz.
Benitez would go on to win the election on April 10 with 46 percent of the vote. However, since none of the candidates surpassed the 50 percent threshold, Benitez will face Armendariz—who received a third of the primary vote—in a runoff election Tuesday.
According to a rubric given to the class, the assignment was a way for students to make up the class’s service learning requirement for those who had not yet fulfilled it. The assignment required students to spend eight hours at the TALB offices phone banking for Benitez and would count toward 20 percent of their grade.
The rubric itself does not mention the names of any of the candidates in the education board race.
One point of contention the students bring up in the FPPC complaint is that all assignments involving service learning work—such as the one in question—are coordinated by the university’s Center for Community Engagement, which is headed by Benitez, according to the school’s website.
In their unsworn complaint, the student organizations asked the agency to investigate what role, if any, Benitez played in assigning students in Rodriguez’s class to phone bank for his own campaign.
At the time of publication, the university’s Public Affairs Department had not yet divulged how much Benitez’s role at the university intersected with this specific assignment, a question we posed to them on May 25.
FPPC Communications Director Jay Wierenga confirmed that they received the student’s complaint filed on May 21 and said it could take up to two weeks for the agency—which investigates political campaign malpractice in the state—to decide if it will open a probe into the matter. Though the agency is cognizant of election dates, the duration of an investigation depends on the complexity of the case, he said.
The complaint was filed by Nathan Carbajal—a CSULB student who was not in Rodriguez’s class—on behalf of La Raza Student Association and the Young Democratic Socialists of America.
It was another student-member from La Raza who submitted the original grievance to the university after she attempted to complete Rodriguez’s assignment and found it “disturbing” that he never mentioned any of the candidates in the education board race except for Benitez.
“I am bothered that a professor discretely managed to use his authority to promote a specific political agenda,” the student wrote to the university’s Dean of Students Piya Bose.
The student chose not to comment for this story, citing a fear of reprisal.
Rodriguez and Benitez appear to have a close working relationship at the university. The Daily 49er in 2011 reported that the pair were in charge of the university’s Community Scholars Program and both are currently faculty members in the school’s Chicano and Latino Studies Department.
Rodriguez has also liked several posts made by Benitez’s campaign Facebook page.
FORTHE Media attempted to contact Rodriguez via email, asking, among other questions, how he would characterize his relationship with Benitez, but he did not respond. Two phone calls also went unreturned.
Rodriguez, an associate professor of Chicano and Latino Studies, is also a Santa Ana Unified School District board member.
We also reached out to Benitez’s campaign for comment and on Saturday, they issued a statement to us saying that the FPPC had not yet notified them about a complaint filed against Benitez.
“We cannot comment about an alleged complaint until we have seen it,” the statement said.
After we sent the campaign a copy of a letter from the FPPC dated May 23 notifying the Benitez campaign that a complaint had been lodged against them—and which contained the original complaint—they did not respond to follow-up questions.
Tomisin Oluwole
Coquette
Acrylic on canvas
18 x 24 inches
Click here to check out our interview with Tomisin Oluwole, a a literary and visual artist based in Long Beach.
Benitez has taught at CSULB for 22 years.
The complaint goes on to allege that Rodriguez violated a law barring state employees from using public resources for campaign activity and that the university violated the state education code mandating that public universities remain neutral in regard to political campaigns.
For its part, the university said it was aware of the complaint and that an investigation had been conducted by its Academic Affairs Department.
“We’ve looked into it and haven’t found any wrongdoing as it relates to these allegations,” said CSULB Associate Vice President of Public Affairs Terri Carbaugh.
When asked if any disciplinary action was taken by the university in this case, she said she couldn’t comment on the specifics of personnel-related investigations.
“We take such allegations seriously. The campus has policies and procedures in place governing the use of state resources and community service learning,” Carbaugh said in a statement later emailed to FORTHE Media.
Carbajal said a number of students completed the assignment by phone banking for Benitez’s campaign but could not provide an exact count.
The complaint also accuses Benitez of violating a state campaign fairness law that requires a candidate who “receives contributions from a state or local government agency” to “report receipt of those contributions,” including the salary of a state employee engaging in partisan campaign activities.
A review by FORTHE Media of Benitez’s campaign finance disclosures from 2018 did not show that any such public contribution was reported.
The disclosure documents do report in-kind donations related to phone banking by TALB.
The Executive Director of TALB, Chris Callopy, said student volunteers are a typical part of the union’s campaigning operation.
“When we get volunteers here we don’t ask where they’re from, we’re just happy to get them,” he said.
Callopy said that all of the candidates throughout the race have used students from a variety of schools as volunteers, including Benitez’s runoff opponent Armendariz.
However, the allegations in the complaint aren’t that the assignment contained campaign work, but that it’s design was inherently partisan.
When asked if any of the students campaigning for Benitez during the time in question voiced anything like the allegations contained in the complaint, he said he did not remember any who did.
“I don’t have any knowledge of anyone forcing anyone to do anything as a volunteer,” he said.
Benitez’s opponent in the upcoming runoff, Armendariz, explained that he’s had former students volunteer for his campaign but never any of his current students.
“Oh my god, no. I am shocked. That is something I would never do,” the high school teacher said when asked if his campaign had engaged in practices like those alleged in the complaint.
It’s important to note that Benitez is not accused of employing his own students as campaign volunteers, but that the assignment given to the students in Rodriguez’s class was under the purview and was likely coordinated through a university department headed by Benitez.
Still, Carbajal and the student groups behind the complaint feel that if Benitez had a hand in pushing the assignment, it could be considered undue influence in the outcome of the primary election, which would have implications outside of campus.
Carbajal said: “This behavior could affect the community as a whole, seeing as it’s a school board election.”
Help Us Create An Independent Media Platform for Long Beach
We believe that what we are trying to do here is not only unique, but constitutes a valuable community resource. We are dedicated to building a fiercely independent, not-for-profit, and non-hierarchical media organization that serves Long Beach. Our hope is that such a publication will increase civic participation, offer a platform to marginalized voices, provide in-depth coverage of our vibrant art scene, and expose injustices and corruption through impactful investigations. Mainly, we plan to continue to tell the truth, and have fun doing it. We know all this sounds ambitious, but we’re on our way there and making progress every day.
Here’s what we don’t believe in: our dominant local media being owned by one of the city’s wealthiest moguls or a far-flung hedge fund. We believe journalism must be skeptical and provide oversight. To do so, a publication should remain free from financial conflicts of interest. That means no sugar daddy or mama for us, but also no advertisements. We answer to no one except to our readers.
We call ourselves grassroots media not only because we are committed to producing work that is responsive to you, dear reader, but because in order for this project to continue we will also need your support. If you believe in our mission, please consider becoming a monthly donor—even a small amount helps!