Inside the Huntington Beach-Long Beach Amazon HQ2 Proposal

The city kept the proposal a secret from the public until Long Beach-Huntington Beach were eliminated from the running

by Kevin Flores  |  Published January 22, 2018 in Journalism

4 minute read
Share
Tweet1
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
1 Shares

1/27/18 This story was updated to reflect new information about the cost of producing the HBLB proposal.

The cities of Long Beach and Huntington Beach didn’t make the cut for Amazon’s massive “HQ2” campus, but a look inside their joint proposal may offer a glimpse into what incentives officials are willing to fork over to large companies looking to build or relocate here in the future.

The city kept the proposal a secret from the public until Long Beach-Huntington Beach were eliminated from the running. Officials said that the disclosure of the bid would “adversely affect [the city’s] chances of ultimately being awarded a contract by Amazon.”

It should be noted that Long Beach is still part of a Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation nine-site bid that was chosen as a finalist by Amazon, though the proposal has not been made public.

FORTHE Media obtained the “HBLB” proposal Friday after Amazon announced Long Beach wasn’t one of the 20 cities the Seattle-based mega-retailer was still considering as a home for its second national headquarters and 50,000 new employees.

The 128-page proposal paints a portrait of a surf-and-turf lifestyle dubbed “Amazon Coast,” and envisioned a three-part campus for HQ2 in the Southland, with one site in Huntington Beach and two sites in Long Beach.

The Long Beach sites would include a cluster of three downtown buildings (District 2) dubbed “Amazon Sea” and a former Boeing property on Wardlow Road near the Long Beach Airport (District 5) dubbed “Amazon Air.” A total of about 80 acres of real estate.  

Even combined, the two cities fell short of the one million person population requirement listed in the request for proposal put out by Amazon on Sept. 7.

The HBLB proposal was accompanied by an online promo video featuring surfer Brett Simpson and a custom-made surfboard that was delivered to Amazon with the proposal.

The city of Long Beach paid $28,825 for services related to the production of the proposal to ad agency interTrend Communications and to consulting firm Michael Baker International.

To sweeten the deal for the $500 billion company, various tax abatements or diversion agreements were put forth by the cities. The figures are mostly estimates based on various assumptions about the economic impact Amazon would have had on the area.

The Long Beach-specific benefits include:

–The creation of a tax increment financing district around the Wardlow site that would capture future property taxes associated with an increase of real estate value from the HQ2 development and return up to $28 million of it to Amazon. This would essentially allow the company to pay property taxes to itself.

Tomisin Oluwole
Fragmented Reflection I, 2021
Acrylic on canvas panel
24 x 30 inches

Click here to check out our interview with Tomisin Oluwole, a literary and visual artist based in Long Beach.

Instead of gunking up our site with ads, we use this space to display and promote the work of local artists.

–A transient occupancy tax investment agreement that would redirect an estimated $4.65 million of hotel bed taxes over a decade to Amazon as a subsidy or to fund Amazon-centric projects.

–A sales tax sharing agreement between both cities and Amazon that would return $3.65 million yearly to the retailer as a subsidy from the cities’ combined sales tax funds.

–A vague plan to reimburse Amazon with a share of taxes collected from the company’s construction, machinery, and equipment purchases. It is unclear how this would dovetail with the sales tax sharing agreement.

In addition, a report from the California governor’s office said Amazon could claim up to $300 million in tax breaks from the state, Reuters reported in October.

“Please note the incentives itemized in the proposal are an illustrative sampling of potential incentives and do not represent an exhaustive list,” the HBLB proposal states and goes on to say that any local incentive programs offered to Amazon would first need to be approved by the city council.

But even the thought of such handouts signals the amount of public money the city is willing to allow a wealthy corporation to cede control over in the name of job creation. Many of the features the city proudly touts in the HBLB proposal, such as public transportation and education, are institutions and services supported by taxes that Amazon would not have had to pay into had this deal gone through.

The bid was also put together amid projections that the city of Long Beach will have a $15.6 million budget deficit in 2019, when the first phase of construction on HQ2 would have begun.

It is also relevant to note that these incentive offers come as the city is currently experiencing a boon of investment and with it rapid gentrification, making it almost certain that Amazon’s won’t be the last race-to-the-bottom bidding war Long Beach enters.

Below is the full proposal.

 

HBLB Amazon Proposal by FORTHE Media on Scribd

Help Us Create An Independent Media Platform for Long Beach

We believe that what we are trying to do here is not only unique, but constitutes a valuable community resource. We are dedicated to building a fiercely independent, not-for-profit, and non-hierarchical media organization that serves Long Beach. Our hope is that such a publication will increase civic participation, offer a platform to marginalized voices, provide in-depth coverage of our vibrant art scene, and expose injustices and corruption through impactful investigations. Mainly, we plan to continue to tell the truth, and have fun doing it. We know all this sounds ambitious, but we’re on our way there and making progress every day.

Here’s what we don’t believe in: our dominant local media being owned by one of the city’s wealthiest moguls or a far-flung hedge fund. We believe journalism must be skeptical and provide oversight. To do so, a publication should remain free from financial conflicts of interest. That means no sugar daddy or mama for us, but also no advertisements. We answer to no one except to our readers.

We call ourselves grassroots media not only because we are committed to producing work that is responsive to you, dear reader, but because in order for this project to continue we will also need your support. If you believe in our mission, please consider becoming a monthly donor⁠—even a small amount helps!

Donate

Contact The Author

More by Kevin Flores
  kevin@forthe.org   @reporterkflores
Share
Tweet1
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
1 Shares

Editors' Picks

Copyright © 2024 FORTHE.org. All rights reserved.

[1] Militarily demobilized. Since WWII—which was both the death knell of European colonial empires as well as the starting shot of the American neocolonial era—Europe has had notoriously scant standing armies, and has been able to consistently slash government military spending domestically and as a percentage of their contributions to international diplomatic bodies such as the UN. This is because nowadays European nations very rarely find themselves in situations where they need to independently send their militaries abroad in order to secure trade routes, foreign resources, or privileges within markets overseas; the U.S. has been fulfilling that hard-power obligation for them for over half a century. The social results of Western Europe’s decreased militarization are striking, especially when contrasted with the U.S.: there is not a single country in Western Europe without universal healthcare, labor rights and welfare systems are strong, value is placed on corporate and financial regulation, environmental policy is lightyears ahead, and, not least of all, there is a robust governmental approach to curbing digital surveillance and reining in tech monopolies. Japan enjoys a similar arrangement with the U.S. in which it, too, is militarily demobilized yet is given full access to, and prominence in, the global economy. In the last decade there has been a reversing trend of remilitarization in some of these nations. That trend was hastened during the last four years as a result of Trump’s ultranationalist politics, but is likely to continue even after his departure in large part due to the growing bipolar geopolitical climate of competition between superpowers.

The “owner” bit of home-“owner” appears in scare quotes throughout the text for reasons that will shortly become apparent.

Nothing signals trouble quite like consensus.

More on them later.

And, anyways, what exactly remains “obvious” in an era “post-truth”?

I take as my starting position that even the “obvious” must be won.

It’s like Lenin said, you know…

Whether directly, or through a chain of investments, or through the wider speculative market in real estate.

I use “banks” in this piece as a stand-in for several sources of income that derive partly through the mortgaging of property and/or investment in institutions that have the power to mortgage property.

That is just its “ideology.”

The Ricardian “law of rent” explains that any location with an advantage over another location, can accrue an economic value, called “rent,” to the owner.

This happens without the owner needing to pitch in to create the advantage.

If the owner does pitch in, then the value accrued from that advantage cannot be called “rent.”

“Rent,” in economic terms, is only, precisely, the value accrued from that portion of the advantage for which the owner is not responsible. That is what we mean when we say, “Rent is theft.”

This does not mean places with lower property taxes ipso facto have higher property prices—and that is because the property tax is only one of the contributing factors. You could have zero taxes on land in Antarctica, for instance, and it would still sell for $0. This is why the introduction to the analogy controls for such variables.

This is the logical conclusion of believing two premises:

(1) All humans have an equal right to the Earth.
(2) Vaginal birth is a lottery system

Prop 13 is rent control for home-“owners.” You can learn more about its history and impact here.

“Hamlet” by William Shakespeare. Act 4, Scene 5

This is why the lobbyists who spend the most money to support the mortgage interest deduction are bankers, mortgagers, and realtors.

Term

Definition