Announcing New Series FORTHE Explains

A new series that will help Long Beach residents survive, organize, and hold landlords, police, polluters, and politicians accountable

4 minute read

Curious about how much money a company donated to your councilmember last election? Perhaps you want to form a tenants union or track down a slumlord who’s been hiding behind a shell company. We’re going to show you how and more!

We’re excited to announce a new series of explainers debuting this week that will walk you through finding important city records, accessing lifesaving resources, and understanding who owns and controls Long Beach. 

We believe that to achieve a more just city, we need to arm residents with the information that can help them survive, organize, and fight back in an era of staggering inequalities, crushing debt, unaffordable housing, and rising economic insecurity. For that reason, this series will emphasize publishing and distributing information that can help our city’s residents subvert everyday power imbalances, improve media literacy, build collective resilience, and empower those most often in economically marginalized positions: renters, students, single mothers, immigrants, and poor people.

Some of the questions we’ll be answering in the coming weeks and months include: What to do if you receive an eviction notice, who owns the local media, where to access harm reduction resources, how to participate in a City Council meeting, and how to unionize your workplace.

The goal of this explainer series is two-fold. 

We hope to redistribute power by democratizing information. What does that mean? Too often the information you need to hold public officials accountable, learn about what your city government is doing, follow the money, and fight back against negligent landlords and exploitative bosses can be hard to access and hard to understand. Often that’s on purpose—because information is power.

Eventually, our goal is to build a living library of deeply researched, localized guides published and distributed online and in print—in English, Spanish, and Khmer. We’ll be partnering with our friends at PLACE, our city’s very own community print studio, to make physical copies of these explainers for those who may not have regular access to the internet. You’ll soon see our free booklets in cafés, laundromats, bars, and bookstores. We’ll be partnering with mutual aid groups, farmers markets, community groups, and libraries to further distribute this information as widely as possible.

We also plan to integrate ways that readers can suggest topics they’d like us to explain in the future. We hope for this to become a public service that is responsive to the needs of the communities we serve.

Our second goal is to provide mentorship, editorial support, and paid work to newly graduated and early career journalists, who will be authoring most of these explainers. While our city has a university with a journalism program, there are few opportunities for graduates to learn the ins and outs of local reporting in Long Beach. And we are all worse for it. Research shows that fewer local reporters means lower voter turnout, as well as more corruption, waste, air pollution, and corporate crime.

There needs to be more training grounds for those who want to be local reporters. We want to help build that. For the last few months, we’ve been working behind the scenes to connect and collaborate with a network of local up-and-coming journalists to put this project together. In the coming months, these reporters will have opportunities to participate in editing workshops and trainings to further their skills in local reporting and investigative techniques.

Here’s where we need your help. A collection of information designed to help the people of Long Beach survive, organize, and fight back against powerful people and systems that cause harm has never existed before. We’ve been able to get this project off the ground thanks to our generous subscribers. But for us to build this project out long term, we need additional support. 

Please consider making a one-time donation or becoming a monthly donor below. All donations are tax deductible and will go directly toward paying writers and printing costs for this project.

If you’re not able to contribute financially, you can still help out by sharing this post and asking your Long Beach network to follow us on social media.

Contact The Author

[1] Militarily demobilized. Since WWII—which was both the death knell of European colonial empires as well as the starting shot of the American neocolonial era—Europe has had notoriously scant standing armies, and has been able to consistently slash government military spending domestically and as a percentage of their contributions to international diplomatic bodies such as the UN. This is because nowadays European nations very rarely find themselves in situations where they need to independently send their militaries abroad in order to secure trade routes, foreign resources, or privileges within markets overseas; the U.S. has been fulfilling that hard-power obligation for them for over half a century. The social results of Western Europe’s decreased militarization are striking, especially when contrasted with the U.S.: there is not a single country in Western Europe without universal healthcare, labor rights and welfare systems are strong, value is placed on corporate and financial regulation, environmental policy is lightyears ahead, and, not least of all, there is a robust governmental approach to curbing digital surveillance and reining in tech monopolies. Japan enjoys a similar arrangement with the U.S. in which it, too, is militarily demobilized yet is given full access to, and prominence in, the global economy. In the last decade there has been a reversing trend of remilitarization in some of these nations. That trend was hastened during the last four years as a result of Trump’s ultranationalist politics, but is likely to continue even after his departure in large part due to the growing bipolar geopolitical climate of competition between superpowers.

The “owner” bit of home-“owner” appears in scare quotes throughout the text for reasons that will shortly become apparent.

Nothing signals trouble quite like consensus.

More on them later.

And, anyways, what exactly remains “obvious” in an era “post-truth”?

I take as my starting position that even the “obvious” must be won.

It’s like Lenin said, you know…

Whether directly, or through a chain of investments, or through the wider speculative market in real estate.

I use “banks” in this piece as a stand-in for several sources of income that derive partly through the mortgaging of property and/or investment in institutions that have the power to mortgage property.

That is just its “ideology.”

The Ricardian “law of rent” explains that any location with an advantage over another location, can accrue an economic value, called “rent,” to the owner.

This happens without the owner needing to pitch in to create the advantage.

If the owner does pitch in, then the value accrued from that advantage cannot be called “rent.”

“Rent,” in economic terms, is only, precisely, the value accrued from that portion of the advantage for which the owner is not responsible. That is what we mean when we say, “Rent is theft.”

This does not mean places with lower property taxes ipso facto have higher property prices—and that is because the property tax is only one of the contributing factors. You could have zero taxes on land in Antarctica, for instance, and it would still sell for $0. This is why the introduction to the analogy controls for such variables.

This is the logical conclusion of believing two premises:

(1) All humans have an equal right to the Earth.
(2) Vaginal birth is a lottery system

Prop 13 is rent control for home-“owners.” You can learn more about its history and impact here.

“Hamlet” by William Shakespeare. Act 4, Scene 5

This is why the lobbyists who spend the most money to support the mortgage interest deduction are bankers, mortgagers, and realtors.

Term

Definition